No. 20-1318
Vincent W. Shack v. NBC Universal Media, LLC, et al.
Tags: bivens-action civil-rights civil-rights-violation constitutional-rights due-process federal-agents governmental-immunity qualified-immunity
Key Terms:
DueProcess FirstAmendment
DueProcess FirstAmendment
Latest Conference:
2021-05-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does the law afford the means to prevent and redress alleged civil rights abuse by public officers and agencies?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
Question Presented Does the law afford the means to prevent and redress alleged civil right abuse by public officers and agencies? " The court allowed the use of 4 United States Constitutional Rights to be granted to one at the expense of another" Does governmental privileges extend to federal agents who clearly violate . constitutional rights and act outside their authority? Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics.
Docket Entries
2021-08-02
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-07-08
DISTRIBUTED.
2021-06-24
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-06-01
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-13
Reply of petitioner Vincent W. Shack filed. (Distributed)
2021-05-11
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/27/2021.
2021-04-21
Brief of respondents NBC Universal Media, LLC, et al. in opposition filed.
2021-01-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 21, 2021)
Attorneys
NBC Universal Media, LLC, et al.
Paul Karsten Schrieffer — P.K. SCHRIEFFER LLP, Respondent
Paul Karsten Schrieffer — P.K. SCHRIEFFER LLP, Respondent