No. 20-1320

Wael Lasheen v. Supreme Court of Ohio

Lower Court: Ohio
Docketed: 2021-03-23
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: administrative-judge administrative-jurisdiction disqualification due-process judicial-disqualification judicial-procedure jurisdiction ohio-revised-code opportunity-to-be-heard state-court-review unconstitutional
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-05-20
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Can a case proceed if the petitioner argues that the administrative judge lacked jurisdiction?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1-Can a case proceed if the petitioner argues that the administrative judge, appointing judges to the petitioner’s case, lacked jurisdiction to do so without having his petition of lack of Jurisdiction addressed? 2-Did the Ohio Supreme Court err when they declared that Administrative Judges are not subject to disqualification under Ohio Revised Code (O.R.C). 2701.03? Therefore is the O.R.C. 2701.03, as interpreted by the Ohio Supreme Court, unconstitutional? 3-Was the petitioner given the opportunity to be heard by the Ohio Supreme Court on every question involving his rights and interests, in their September 11th, 2020 decision? ; : CA

Docket Entries

2021-05-24
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-04
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/20/2021.
2021-02-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 22, 2021)

Attorneys

Wael Lasheen
Wael Lasheen — Petitioner