No. 20-1321

John Ching En Lee v. United States

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-03-23
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: 18-usc-1001 6th-amendment certificate-of-appealability due-process ineffective-assistance ineffective-assistance-of-counsel law-of-the-case materiality sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-06-03 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether Petitioner is entitled to a Certificate of Appealability

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether Petitioner is entitled to a Certificate of Appealability since he has made a substantial showing that he was denied Due Process under the Due Process Clause of the Constitution, because the Government did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt the elements of Falsity, Intent, Materiality, required for conviction under 18 USC 1001. 2. Whether Petitioner is entitled to a Certificate of Appealability since he has made a substantial showing that he was denied Effective Assistance of Counsel under the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution because Trial Counsel’s improper stipulation to Jury Instruction was based on arbitrary and contradictory evidence. 3. Whether Petitioner’s 2255 Motion presents an exception to the Law of the Case Doctrine because the conviction is clearly erroneous and its enforcement would work a manifest injustice. ii

Docket Entries

2021-06-07
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021.
2021-05-03
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-04-19
Petition DENIED.
2021-03-31
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/16/2021.
2021-03-29
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-03-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 22, 2021)

Attorneys

John Lee
John Ching En Lee — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. PrelogarActing Solicitor General, Respondent