Was this a coordinated effort by government employees to undermine the Rule of Law?

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED 1) Seven (7) government agencies failed in applying Title VII mandates as outlined in our United States Constitution; Was this a coordinated effort by government employees to : undermine the Rule of Law for the purpose of attacking and/or diminishing our Democracy. 2) Did the United States Federal Court for the Eastern District violate Constitutional Due Process rights by assigning and unassigning this Pro-Se litigant’s case, in a deliberate effort to suppress evidence resulting in irreparable harm to this aggrieving Plaintiff? 3) Did AFSCME Employee Union as co-defendants in this case, violate Plaintiffs Constitutional rights of equal protection under law by a) failing to represent this Employee Steward with a licensed attorney, and b) remaining complicit for the purpose of maintaining their government contract with said Defendants? 4) Did the California Personnel Board breech Title VII requirements by ruling that an Employment Contract begins prior to an employee and employer ever demonstrates a meeting of the minds? Were their actions an attack on the rule of law, both in substance and in fact, that violates the basic : tenants of Contract law? 5) Did Federal EEOC Analysts fail to issue a Subpoena to Defendants, to discover if the Employer engaged in Retaliation against this when the Employer received a Cease-and-Desist Order? 6) Did the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit fail to provide this with equal protections under law, by sanctioning the lower court’s ruling against this 2 QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Cont. 7) Pro-Se Litigant without applying due diligence and absent the investigation of genuine evidence? 8) Did Defendants, a government employer, engage in a “pattern” of racial discrimination against this . for the purpose of preventing this African American Psychologist from becoming licensed in the State of California? ; 3