Whether a continued contact can be deemed a 'consensual encounter' emanating immediately from a period of unlawfully extended detention

QUESTIONS PRESENTED In 2015, this Court decided the case of Rodriguez v. UnitedStates, 575 U.S. 348 (2015) [135 S.Ct. 1609, 191 L.Ed.2d 492], limiting the scope of traffic detentions to the period of time necessary to complete the “mission” that justified the traffic detention at its inception. At issue in the present case, in which a detention was correctly held to have been unlawfullyextended, is the interrelationship between an unlawfully extended detention, and the concept and application of an ensuing purported “consensual encounter.” The questions presented are: 1. Whether a continued contact can be deemed a “consensual encounter” emanating immediately from a period of unlawfully extended detention; 2. Whether, and in what manner, the subject of an unlawfully extended detention must prove that “but for” the unlawful extension of the detention, the evidence sought to be suppressed would not have come to light; 3. Whether traditional “attenuation” from the unlawfully extended detention must be found before the concept of a “consensual encounter” can applied; and 4. Whether a valid, untainted consent to further contact, and ultimately to search the Petitioner’s vehicle, was established. i