Has the 'peoples' right to 'personal liberty' been suspended?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW: 1) Has the 'peoples' right to ‘personal liberty' been suspended? Whereas the State; through statutes; : is criminalizing 'personal liberty’ while authorizing its . agencies arid agents to seize private without warrants; taking without compensation; then the transfer of such _ property to a private entity, as well as authorizing ; that private entity the right to demand compensation : for the return of said property. 2) Does a statute which operates without mens . : rea, that criminalizes a contractual obligation, deny . Due Process of Law and is this statute overly broad and vague on it's face and as applied? Os . 3) Do the rulings/actions of judges and justices; ' in this case; deny Due Process of Law, violate their : oaths of office to support the Constitution as well as . constitute an ‘Unfair Trial’? Whereas the trial judge : has; declared that definitions in a dictionary are not : relevant in the State of Maine; denied questioning a : witness on his/her knowledge of the Constitution; as well as denied submission of relevant evidence and : law to the jury. = i . PARTIES INVOLVED: Prescott McCurdy A.A.G. MaComber : Petitioner Respondant 34 Allen Point Rd. 6 Statehouse Station Harpswell, ME 04079 Augusta, ME 04333-006 (207) 449-1446 (207) 626-8507 LIST OF PROCEEDINGS: State of Maine v. Prescott McCurdy, CUMCR 18-20749, Cumberland County Superior Court, Judgment entered July 15, 2019. : State of Maine v. Prescott McCurdy, CUM-19: 275, Maine Supreme Court, Judgment entered, March 5, 2020. : (SIMILAR CASES) ‘ : State of Maine v. Prescott McCurdy, CUMCR -18-20748, Cumberland County Superior Court, Judgment entered August 6, 2019 State of Maine v. Prescott McCurdy,CUM-19391, Maine Supreme Court, Judgment entered, May 12, 2020. il