No. 20-1378
Linda Rizzo-Rupon, et al. v. International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO District 141, Local 914, et al.
Tags: agency-fees first-amendment janus-v-afscme private-sector-employees railway-labor-act state-action union-representation
Key Terms:
Arbitration ERISA FirstAmendment LaborRelations JusticiabilityDoctri
Arbitration ERISA FirstAmendment LaborRelations JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Does this Court's recent First Amendment agency-fee ban announced in Janus v. AFSCME apply to private-sector employees governed by the Railway Labor Act?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW 1. Does this Court’s recent First Amendment agencyfee ban announced in Janus v. AFSCME, __ US. ___, 138 S.Ct. 2448 (2018), apply to matters involving private-sector employees governed by the auspices of the Railway Labor Act? 2. Is there state action present when private-sector employees challenge agency fees under the RLA?
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-14
Reply of petitioners Linda Rizzo-Rupon, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2021-06-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-02
Brief of respondent International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO District 141 Local 914, et al. in support filed.
2021-04-07
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 2, 2021, for all respondents.
2021-04-06
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 3, 2021 to June 2, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-03-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 3, 2021)
Attorneys
International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers, AFL-CIO District 141 Local 914, et al.
Elizabeth Ann Roma — Guerrieri, Bartos & Roma, PC, Respondent
Linda Rizzo-Rupon, et al.
Patrick J. Wright — Mackinac Center for Public Policy, Petitioner