No. 20-1381

Matthew Fox, et al. v. Charles A. Summers

Lower Court: Ohio
Docketed: 2021-04-01
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (6) Experienced Counsel
Tags: compelling-state-interest constitutional-protection crime-victim due-process fourteenth-amendment government-dissemination informational-privacy public-officials
Key Terms:
DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-06-03
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process right to informational privacy protects information of a personal, sexual nature related to one's victimization from government dissemination absent a compelling state interest

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Petitioners Fox and Grey are public officials whose offices maintain records of the graphic details of sex crimes committed against Petitioner J.K., a minor crime victim. Despite Sixth Circuit precedent establishing constitutional protection for these records, the Ohio Supreme Court has ordered Petitioners Fox and Grey to release all of them to Respondent and to do so without redaction. The question presented is: Whether the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process right to informational privacy protects information of a personal, sexual nature related to one’s victimization from government dissemination absent a compelling state interest, a question as to which the courts of appeals are in conflict. ii RELATED CASES e §©State ex rel. Summers v. Fox, No. 2018-0959, Ohio Supreme Court. Judgment entered Dec. 10, 2020.

Docket Entries

2021-06-07
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Buckeye State Sheriffs’ Association GRANTED.
2021-06-07
Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Legal Momentum, et al. GRANTED.
2021-06-07
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys Association GRANTED.
2021-06-07
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021.
2021-05-18
Reply of petitioner Matthew Fox, Jeff Grey, J.K. filed. (Distributed)
2021-05-03
Motion for leave to file amici brief filed by Legal Momentum, et al.
2021-05-03
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Buckeye State Sheriffs’ Association.
2021-05-03
Brief of respondent Charles Summers in opposition filed.
2021-04-30
Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys Association.
2021-03-30
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 3, 2021)

Attorneys

Buckeye State Sheriffs’ Association
Katherine Connor FergusonKooperman Mentel Ferguson Yaross Ltd., Amicus
Katherine Connor FergusonKooperman Mentel Ferguson Yaross Ltd., Amicus
Charles Summers
H. Louis Sirkin — Respondent
H. Louis Sirkin — Respondent
Legal Momentum, et al.
Mary-Christine SungailaBuchalter. A Professional Corporation, Amicus
Mary-Christine SungailaBuchalter. A Professional Corporation, Amicus
Matthew Fox, Jeff Grey, J.K.
Shay DvoretzkySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Petitioner
Shay DvoretzkySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP, Petitioner
Elizabeth Alexandra WellOhio Crime Victim Justice Center, Petitioner
Elizabeth Alexandra WellOhio Crime Victim Justice Center, Petitioner
Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys Association
Jacquenette Susanne CorganSummit County Prosecutor's Office, Amicus
Jacquenette Susanne CorganSummit County Prosecutor's Office, Amicus