Whether denial of fundamental rights, denial of property rights, and denial of access to courts warrants remedy

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether denial of my fundamental right to protection provided by the law, denial of my rights to private property, personal security, health, reputation, and denial of access to the Court to seek redress for my rights, in violation of the 1°, 5th, 7th, 8th and 14th Amendments grounded in substantive Due Process, 42 U.S.C.§ 1983, and 18 U.S.C. §§241, 245, 249, warrants this Court to provide the remedy long due to me, a disabled 73year old female citizen of color. 2. Whether deprivation of rights of liberty, private property, and personal security (consisting of legal and uninterrupted enjoyment of life, limbs, body, health and reputation) of a disabled elder female iv citizen of color, injured by direct denial of access to the courts by officers in breach of solemn oaths of office, and entitled to redress and a damages remedy for constitutional violations, warrants this Court hold those Corporations who conspired to injure and injured the citizen, liable for damages for constitutional violations grounded in Substantive Due Process of the 5th and 14th Amendments, Equal Protections of the Law Clause of the 14th Amendment, 42 U.S.C.§ 1983, and 18 U.S.C. §§241, 245, 249, for their knowingly false and malicious destruction of the citizen’s health, property and reputation, designed to hide their own misconduct. 3. Whether the Appellate Court entertaining an Answer on Appeal when the Defendants filed no Answer to the Complaint in the District Court, depriving me of my right to win by Default, violates : the Equal Protection of the Laws Clause of the 14h Amendment. 4. Whether a reasonable person would find it . abnormal for a court awarding $148K in attorneys’ fees to Defendants who failed to answer the Complaint and an Appellate court affirming it, and defaming the Plaintiff who won by. default, pointing to something being hidden. 5. Whether defaming the Plaintiff in order to hide the failure to uphold the Supreme Law of the Land — Vv this Court's own stare decisis Mandated Prohibition from repudiating Government-issued patent grant contracts without just compensation to the inventor, as declared by Chief Justice Marshall in Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward (1819), Grant v. Raymond (1832), Fletcher v. Peck (1810) — the Law of the Case, warrants this Supreme Court redress the injury to me by itself upholding Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward (1819), Grant v. Raymond (1832), Fletcher v. Peck (1810), restoring my rights, reinstating my property, striking all Orders in my cases and awarding financial damages to remedy the injury to my property, finances, health and reputation. 6. Whether tampering with the record and denying _ access to the court upon the question of due process and oppressing me by defaming me and harassing me in hate crime to silence me to hide not upholding Trustees of Dartmouth College v. Woodward (1819), Grant v. Raymond (1832), Fletcher v. Peck (1810) — the Law of the Case and Law of the Land — is an acceptable standard for this Court to allow the inferior courts to aid and abet antitrust. i PREAMBLE RES ACCENDENT LUMINA REBUS ONE THING THROWS LIGHT UPON OTHERS This is a Case, where the ONE THING is: there is NO Answer to my Complaint, NO Hearing, NO Trial, No Defendant, only an Order by a Judge, who voluntarily admitted to buying common stock in a Defendant, JPMorgan Chase & Co., dismissing my Case. In my first Appeal Case 18-2105, the Federal Circuit did not find my fight for my constitutional rights and property rights sanctionable. The Federal Circuit denied Presidio Bank’s Motion for sanctions against me for fighting for my constitutional rights and ; property rights in Case 19-1223 on 11/19/2019. Respondents untimely moved for attorneys’ fees two years after the case had been through the Supreme Court Case 19-5033, at the solicitation of the ; : conflicted Judge, who granted the $148K for no injury and for no Answer filed. In my second Appeal Case 20-1493, the Federal