Whether respondent acted with gross negligence to deprive appellant of property

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether respondent, Charles Farris, acted with gross negligence to deprive appellant of his 8468 Orchard Road farm house and % acre of land when appellee failed to investigate every phase of the case prior to the action or investigated every phase of the case prior to the action but failed to discover or discovered that appellant was entitled to the property but acted with active connivance in the making of the deed and deeded the property to Bessie and John Jones. 2. Whether appellees conspired against the appellant to deprive the appellant of property given to him in the Will. 3. Whether appellee Thomasine E. Moore acted with gross negligence when she said, “Appellant wants something he is not entitled to.” 4. Whether appellee Joseph Whitley deprived appellant of his property when appellee acted with deceased Fannie P. Armstrong false reports and other conduct amounting to official discrimination to deprive appellant of property without due process of law in violation of the Will and Last Testament. ii PRECEEDINGS AND RELATED CASES All the parties appear in the caption of the case are on the cover page RELATED CASES Armstrong v North Carolina, et al No. 03-CvS-01939-MFF; Wilson County Superior Court; Judgment entered December 23 2020. Armstrong v North Carolina, et al; No. 41-P-17-7, Supreme Court of North Carolina, Judgment entered March 10, 2021. There is no parent or publicly held company owing 10 % or more of the corporate stock. TABLE OF CONTENT Questions Presented ou. Disclosure statement T Table of