No. 20-1449
Harold Persaud v. United States
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: federal-rules-of-civil-procedure gonzalez-v-crosby habeas-corpus ineffective-assistance-of-counsel ineffective-counsel martinez-rule martinez-v-ryan rule-60b section-2255 trevino-rule trevino-v-thaler
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Patent
HabeasCorpus Patent
Latest Conference:
2021-05-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether under Martinez v. Ryan and Trevino v. Thaler a Petitioner May Use Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) to Reopen a Proceeding Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether under Martinez v. Ryan! and Trevino v. Thaler? a Petitioner May Use Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) to Reopen a Proceeding Under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 on the Basis that Petitioner’s Original Section 2255 Habeas Counsel was Ineffective in Failing to Raise a Patent, Meritorious 2255 Claim, Thereby Creating a Defect in the Original 2255 Proceeding Which Authorizes Reopening the Proceeding under Gonzalez v. Crosby?? 1 Martinez v. Ryan, 1382 S. Ct. 1309 (2012). 2 Trevino v. Thaler, 133 S. Ct. 1911 (2018). 3 Gonzalez v. Crosby, 545 U.S. 524 (2005).
Docket Entries
2021-05-17
Petition DENIED.
2021-04-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
2021-04-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-04-12
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 17, 2021)
Attorneys
Harold Persaud
William Mallory Kent — Kent & McFarland, Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent