No. 20-145

Carl Skidmore v. Joe A. Lizarraga, Warden

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2020-08-12
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: certificate-of-appealability cumulative-error de-novo-review district-court evidentiary-hearing fact-finding habeas-corpus post-conviction speculative
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a certificate of appealability should have issued to address the question whether a district court may deny a habeas-corpus-petition as 'speculative' without conducting an evidentiary-hearing

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTION PRESENTED I. Whether a certificate of appealability should have issued to address the question whether a district court may deny a habeas corpus petition as “speculative” without conducting an evidentiary hearing. I. Whether a certificate of appealability should have issued to address the question whether de novo review of a claim of cumulative error requires de novo review of the underlying errors. i

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-13
Waiver of right of respondent Joe Lizarraga to respond filed.
2020-08-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 11, 2020)

Attorneys

Carl Skidmore
James S. ThomsonJames Thomson, Attorney and Counselor at Law, Petitioner
James S. ThomsonJames Thomson, Attorney and Counselor at Law, Petitioner
Joe Lizarraga
Gregory A. OttCalifornia Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Gregory A. OttCalifornia Attorney General's Office, Respondent