No. 20-145
Carl Skidmore v. Joe A. Lizarraga, Warden
Response Waived
Tags: certificate-of-appealability cumulative-error de-novo-review district-court evidentiary-hearing fact-finding habeas-corpus post-conviction speculative
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus
HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a certificate of appealability should have issued to address the question whether a district court may deny a habeas-corpus-petition as 'speculative' without conducting an evidentiary-hearing
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTION PRESENTED I. Whether a certificate of appealability should have issued to address the question whether a district court may deny a habeas corpus petition as “speculative” without conducting an evidentiary hearing. I. Whether a certificate of appealability should have issued to address the question whether de novo review of a claim of cumulative error requires de novo review of the underlying errors. i
Docket Entries
2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-08-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-13
Waiver of right of respondent Joe Lizarraga to respond filed.
2020-08-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 11, 2020)
Attorneys
Carl Skidmore
James S. Thomson — James Thomson, Attorney and Counselor at Law, Petitioner
James S. Thomson — James Thomson, Attorney and Counselor at Law, Petitioner
Joe Lizarraga
Gregory A. Ott — California Attorney General's Office, Respondent
Gregory A. Ott — California Attorney General's Office, Respondent