No. 20-1450
Michael C. Murphy v. Melissa Ann Blalock, as Executrix of the Estate of Gloria Kay Murphy-Wallace
Response Waived
Tags: access-to-justice civil-procedure constitutional-vagueness due-process judicial-review procedural-due-process standing state-courts tennessee-rules
Key Terms:
Immigration
Immigration
Latest Conference:
2021-06-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Tennessee state trial and appellate courts are using a constitutionally vague procedural rule,Tenn.R.Civ. P. 59.04,to deny citizens an opportunity to be heard and thereby to block access to justice?
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED : , Whether the Tennessee state trial and appellate courts are using a constitutionally vague procedural rule,Tenn.R.Civ. P. 59.04,to deny citizens an opportunity to be heard and thereby to block access to justice? i .
Docket Entries
2021-08-23
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-07-29
DISTRIBUTED.
2021-07-09
Petition for Rehearing filed.
2021-06-14
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/10/2021.
2021-05-05
Waiver of right of respondent Melissa Ann Blalock, as Executrix of the Estate of Gloira Kay Murphy-Wallace to respond filed.
2021-04-13
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 17, 2021)
Attorneys
Melissa Ann Blalock, as Executrix of the Estate of Gloira Kay Murphy-Wallace
Paul K. Hinsley — The Law Office of Kelley Hinsley, Respondent
Paul K. Hinsley — The Law Office of Kelley Hinsley, Respondent