No. 20-1460
Rolando Cruz, Jr. v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: appellate-review conspiracy criminal-procedure evidence evidence-standard indictment indictment-variance rico-conspiracy third-circuit united-states-v-rowe
Key Terms:
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration LaborRelations
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration LaborRelations
Latest Conference:
2021-05-13
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Third Circuit erred in affirming RICO conspiracy convictions based on evidence of a different conspiracy than was charged
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED ; I. | WHETHER IT WAS ERROR FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT TO JUSTIFY AFFIRMANCE OF THE RICO CONSPIRACY CONVICTIONS ON THE BASIS OF EVIDENCE PROVING SOMETHING QUITE DIFFERENT FROM WHAT WAS CHARGED IN THE INDICTMENT? II. WHETHER UNITED STATES V. ROWE APPLIES TO | CONSPIRACY CASES? 2
Docket Entries
2021-04-29
Stipulation to dismissal under Rule 46 filed.
2021-04-29
Petition Dismissed - Rule 46.
2021-04-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/13/2021.
2021-04-21
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-04-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 17, 2021)
Attorneys
Rolando Cruz
Peter Goldberger Jr. — Petitioner
Peter Goldberger Jr. — Petitioner
Rolando Cruz Jr. — Petitioner
Rolando Cruz Jr. — Petitioner
United States
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent