Did the Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal's unchecked power to withhold or strip jurisdiction from the Florida Supreme Court to hear cases involving the Florida and U.S. Constitutional Law violate the Mother's constitutional rights; especially when it created a conflict of interest which allowed the Florida District Court to prevent their own ruling from being reviewed or overturned by the Florida Supreme Court?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED ; QUESTION ONE: . Did the Florida Fifth District Court of Appeal’s unchecked power to withhold or strip jurisdiction from the Florida Supreme Court to hear cases involving the Florida and U.S. Constitutional Law violate the Mother’s constitutional rights; especially when it created a conflict of interest which allowed the Florida District Court to prevent their own ruling from being reviewed or overturned by the Florida Supreme Court? : If allowed in state courts, could the U.S. District Court of Appeals also be granted the exclusive power to control the jurisdiction of the U.S. Supreme Court which would give the U.S. District Court the ability | to prevent their own cases from ever being reviewed . or overturned by the U.S. Supreme Court? ; QUESTION TWO: ; Is it a constitutional violation for Florida courts to divide people into unequal classes where some people are allowed access to the jurisdiction of the Florida Supreme Court while other people (with cases of similar merit) are denied access to the ; Florida Supreme Court based exclusively on which party arbitrarily receives a “written opinion” from the Florida District Courts; but where there is no standard, no transparency, no oversight and no ; predictable process by which someone is granted the required written opinion? Is this practice especially a ; violation when it applies to family law cases where : . the courts have a legal monopoly over the families . and require parents to go through the court system to resolve paternity matters, yet those parents are now being denied -full access to the available court ; system (Boddie v. Connecticut)? QUESTION THREE: Did the Florida Family Court violate the | Mother’s constitutional rights by failing to render a timely ruling for over 16 months and additionally making an error in law which left the Mother pro se during critical hearings for the child’s educational and medical needs? (Is time of the essence in child ; support cases?) :