No. 20-1484
SFPP, L.P. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, et al.
Tags: administrative-procedure-act agency-decision cost-of-service interstate-commerce-act pipeline-rates record-development substantial-evidence
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw Arbitration Securities
AdministrativeLaw Arbitration Securities
Latest Conference:
N/A
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a federal agency complies with the Administrative Procedure Act upon remand
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether a federal agency, upon remand based upon an appellate finding that the agency’s outcome is insufficiently supported, complies with the Administrative Procedure Act if it fails to develop a record based on substantial evidence to support an opposite outcome on remand. Whether a pipeline’s rates set pursuant to the Interstate Commerce Act are just and reasonable and compliant with Fed. Power Comm’n v. Hope Natural Gas Co., 320 U.S. 591, 603 (1944) when a necessary component of the pipeline’s cost-of-service rates is removed without justification. i
Docket Entries
2021-05-20
Petition Dismissed - Rule 46.
2021-05-03
Motion of petitioner to dismiss the petition for a writ of certiorari pursuant to Rule 46.2 filed.
2021-04-27
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including June 23, 2021.
2021-04-26
Motion to extend the time to file a response from May 24, 2021 to June 23, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-04-19
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 24, 2021)
Attorneys
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, et al.
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent