No. 20-1518

QDOS, Inc. v. Matthew Hayden, et al.

Lower Court: Ninth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-04-29
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: appealable-order appellate-panel bankruptcy bankruptcy-appellate-panel bankruptcy-court bankruptcy-proceeding final-order interlocutory-order involuntary-petition judicial-review
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a Bankruptcy Appellate Panel's order reversing a bankruptcy court's dismissal of an involuntary petition constitutes a final, appealable order

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED As this Court has recognized, the correct delineation of the dimensions of a_ bankruptcy “proceeding” is a matter of considerable importance. Ritzen Group, Inc. v. Jackson Masonry, LLC, 140 S. Ct. 582, 587 (2020). Erroneous identification either way — of an interlocutory order as a final decision, or of a final order as interlocutory — has significant detrimental impacts upon litigation. Jd. The question presented is: Whether a Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s order reversing a bankruptcy court’s dismissal of an involuntary petition constitutes a final, appealable order. ii LIST OF ALL

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-16
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-04-29
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 1, 2021)

Attorneys