Whether compelled speech of attorneys unconstitutionally infringes upon their Freedom of Speech

QUESTIONS PRESENTED This case involves compelled speech of attorneys and whether that compelled speech unconstitutionally infringes upon the attorneys’ Freedom of Speech: 1. Did Keller v. State Bar of California, 496 U.S. 1, 110 S. Ct. 2228, 110 L. Ed. 2d 1 (1990), actually decide that an integrated bar may use mandatory dues for germane speech or was it dictum and therefore not binding precedent? 2. IfKeller did actually decide that an integrated bar may use mandatory dues for germane speech, should Keller be overruled to be consistent with Janus v. AFSCME, et al.,__ U.S. __, 188 S. Ct. 2448, 201 L. Ed. 2d 924 (2018)?