Whether the Court of Appeals' decision affirming the dismissal of Petitioners' quantum meruit claim due to alleged inadequate pleading should be reviewed because it conflicts with federal pleading standards and the Supreme Court's decision in Johnson v. Shelby, Mississippi, 574 U.S. 10 (2014)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Court of Appeals’ decision affirming the dismissal of Petitioners’ quantum meruit claim due to alleged inadequate pleading should be reviewed because it conflicts with federal pleading standards and the Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v. Shelby, Mississippi, 574 U.S. 10 (2014). 2. Whether the Court of Appeals’ decision affirming the summary judgment dismissal of the Petitioner’s First Amendment retaliation claim should be reviewed because it conflicts with the Rule 56 standard and sanctions the imposition of a direct, rather than circumstantial, evidentiary burden. i