Did U.S. Congress intend for Title IV-D 42 U.S.C 654(3) contractors escape private law liabilities for violating their 10th amendment protections under their contract with the U.S. government?

QUESTION PRESENTED 1. Did U.S. Congress intend for Title IV-D 42 U.S.C 654(3) contactors escape private law liabilities for violating their 10 amendment protections under their contract with the U.S. government? 2. Did the Respondent forfeit its 11** amendment privilege by in failure to clearly make its intentions known upon a direct challenged by the PetitionerAppellant ("Blessett") in the trial court in 2017 and failure to protect its 11* amendment privilege . before a judicial determination on March 6, 2019, in the 5 Circuit Court by its legal conduct? 3. Does the Texas Title IV-D program violate the "Separation of Powers" with state employees acting as contracted federal agents for the program and Texas state actors cloaked in state sovereignty at the same time? 4. Is it an overreach of "Public Law into Private Law Domain" by Title IV-D of the Social Security Act? 5. Does the Title IV-D program provide any benefits to the noncustodial parent? 6. Who is the primary lender on the interstate contracts in question under federal law? 7. Blessett challenges U.S. Constitutionality of the 42 U.S.C.658a incentives for performance as monetary inducement to coerce the 42 U.S.C. 654(3) contractors to increase performance revenues like any income-generating business and criminalize noncustodial parents? 8. Does federal statute 42 U.S.C. 658a of the Title IV-D of Social Security Act of the program help il create an implicit derogatory bias against child debtor with financial inducement to the state agencies? 9. Can Blessett be defaulted into a Title IV-D contract without due process, without knowledge of the contract, and receiving benefits from the contract? 10.Was Blessett entitled to a copy of a valid legal instrument under 42 U.S.C. 654(12) as proof of Title IV-D interstate contractual obligation as a public law protections for his civil rights as a private individual? 11.Does the Petitioner demand for monetary relief for his injuries caused by 10% amendment protections violations disturb the Respondent's 11% amendment protections under contract law? 12.Does the Petitioners Final Divorce Decree support order as an interstate contract enjoy commerce clause and contact clause protections under Title IV-D enforcement as an equitable instrument? 13.Can the individual Title IV-D agencies as income-generating agencies escape private law liabilities for noncompliance with the federal statutes of their federal program contract? 14.What Public Law prevents the use of the Clearfield Trust Law Doctrine against paid contracted U.S. Government contracted agencies for noncompliance with their contracts and , infringement on Blessett's private contracts? 15.Was Joe Blessett entitled to 'Commerce Clause" protections, and "Contract Clause" protections to prevent the injuries caused by the. Title IV-D agency? ut 16.Can the Title IV-D agency be in of noncompliance with Title IV-D of the Social Security Act and still preserve Federal Statutes, the U.S. Constitution, and 10% amendment protection from suit? 17.Did U.S. Congress intend for Texas Office of Attorney General Title IV-D child support agency violate the "Separation of Powers" by acting as contracted federal agents cloaked in state sovereign authority? 18.Did U.S. Congress intend for Title IV-D as income-generating agencies escape private law liabilities for injuries inflicted on private individuals under contract law? 19.Did U.S. Congress intend for the Texas 42 U.S.C 654(3) contactor and the Texas Department of Public Safety be held liable for the Drivers Privacy Protection Rights Act for the impermissible burden on the petitioner's driver's license under the color of law? WwW