No. 20-155

New England Teamsters and Trucking Industry Pension Fund v. Sun Capital Partners III, LP, et al

Lower Court: First Circuit
Docketed: 2020-08-13
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Amici (1)Response Waived
Tags: circuit-conflict civil-rights culbertson-precedent due-process erisa mppaa partnership partnership-in-fact private-equity private-equity-funds
Key Terms:
Arbitration ERISA Jurisdiction
Latest Conference: 2020-09-29
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the First Circuit's holding that the Sun Funds did not form a partnership-in-fact is inconsistent with this Court's precedent in Culbertson v. Commissioner and presents a conflict among the circuits

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the First Circuit’s holding that the Sun Funds did not form a partnership-in-fact is inconsistent with this Court’s precedent in Culbertson v. Commissioner and presents a conflict among the circuits. 2. Whether the First Circuit’s analysis has created a judicial exemption shielding private equity funds from withdrawal liability in contravention of the purpose of ERISA and the MPPAA as intended by Congress and as set forth by this Court.

Docket Entries

2020-10-05
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-14
Brief amicus curiae of Better Markets, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
2020-08-19
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-14
Waiver of right of respondent Sun Capital Partners III, LP; Sun Capital Partners III QP, LP; and Sun Capital Partners IV, LP to respond filed.
2020-08-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 14, 2020)

Attorneys

Better Markets, Inc.
Dennis Michael KelleherBetter Markets, Inc., Amicus
Dennis Michael KelleherBetter Markets, Inc., Amicus
New England Teamsters and Trucking Industry Pension Fund
Catherine Marie CampbellFeinberg, Campbell & Zack, PC, Petitioner
Catherine Marie CampbellFeinberg, Campbell & Zack, PC, Petitioner
Sun Capital Partners III, LP; Sun Capital Partners III QP, LP; and Sun Capital Partners IV, LP
John Caviness O'QuinnKirkland & Ellis LLP, Respondent
John Caviness O'QuinnKirkland & Ellis LLP, Respondent