Whether the Rooker-Feldman doctrine applies when the underlying state-court judgment is void ab initio

question presented, on which the circuits are split, is: Whether the Rooker-Feldman doctrine applies when the underlying state-court judgment is void ab initio. Petitioner respectfully petitions for a writ of certiorari to review the judgment and decision of the District Court and the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. The Petition is ripe and the Court must address the issues as to entering decision's that departed from the accepted and usual course of judicial proceedings, as to call for an exercise of this Court's supervisory power. An injustice has occurred and the remedy provided is unconscionable based upon the circumstance regarding ' the standard thereof. IL WHETHER THE DISTRICT COURT CASE AND APPEAL WERE WRONGFULLY DISMISSED UNDER THE ROOKER-FELDMAN DOCTRINE WHEN | ti THE ORIGINAL FOREIGN JUDGMENT WAS VOID AND FRAUDULENTLY RENDERED IN VIOLATION OF PETITIONER’S DUE PROCESS THEREBY CREATING A CONFLICT AMONG THE CIRCUIT COURTS AS TO THE APPLICATION OF THE DOCTRINE AND CONTRARY TO THE SPIRIT OF THE DOCTRINE? | . | Be