No. 20-1556

Dawn Herndon v. Judy R. Upton, Warden

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-05-10
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: criminal-procedure equitable-considerations habeas-corpus mootness prison-release sentencing supervised-release
Key Terms:
HabeasCorpus Immigration Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether a habeas case is moot when the defendant has completed their term of imprisonment and commenced supervised release, even though the sentencing court can terminate or reduce the supervised release term and the over-incarceration established in the habeas case would be an equitable consideration

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED A defendant in a federal criminal case receives a paradigmatic sentence -a term of imprisonment, to be followed by a term of supervised release. While in prison, she files a petition for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging that the Bureau of Prisons miscalculated her prison-release date, and will therefore over-incarcerate her. Before the court adjudicates that case, however, she completes her term of imprisonment and commences her term of supervised release. Is her habeas case moot, even though the sentencing court can terminate or reduce her term of supervised release, and the over-incarceration, established in the habeas case, would constitute an “equitable consideration[] of great weight[]” in the sentencing court? Johnson v. United States, 529 U.S. 53, 60 (2000). ti LIST OF ALL PROCEEDINGS DIRECTLY RELATED TO THIS CASE ¢ Herndon vy. Upton, No. 19-11156, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Judgment entered Jan. 18, 2021. ¢ Herndon vy. Upton, No. 18-cev-120, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. Judgment entered Sept. 25, 2019. ¢ United States v. Herndon, No. 17-12373, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Judgment entered Aug. 10, 2018. ¢ Herndon vy. United States, No. 17-12597, U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. Order Denying Motion for Certificate of Appealability entered Sept. 20, 2017; Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration entered Nov. 3, 2017. ¢ Herndon v. United States, No. 17-ev-80501, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Report and Recommendation entered May 1, 2017; Order Adopting Report and Recommendation entered May 24, 2017; Order Denying Motion for Reconsideration entered Jun. 21, 2017. ¢ United States v Herndon, No. 12-cr-80172, U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida. Judgment entered Mar. 25, 2013.

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-31
Reply of petitioner Dawn Herndon filed.
2021-08-23
Brief of respondent Judy R. Upton, Warden in opposition filed.
2021-07-12
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 23, 2021.
2021-07-09
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 23, 2021 to August 23, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-06-17
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 23, 2021.
2021-06-16
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 23, 2021 to July 23, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-05-24
Response Requested. (Due June 23, 2021)
2021-05-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/3/2021.
2021-05-13
Waiver of right of respondent Judy R. Upton, Warden to respond filed.
2021-05-05
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 9, 2021)

Attorneys

Dawn Herndon
Kenneth A. CarusoMukasey Frenchman LLP, Petitioner
Judy R. Upton, Warden
Brian H. FletcherActing Solicitor General, Respondent