Whether COA/Texas-courts contravene the U.S. Constitution and Federal laws

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Texas contravenes the Due Process Clause of the U.S. Constitution on multi-count and contradicts SCOTUS. SCOTUS has yet to answer all States contradicting due process against Fourteenth Amendment whether COA/Texas-courts :a. Prohibit all critical defense-witnesses waiting to testify, b. Prohibit recross to impeach the State-Perjurers present-outside subject-to-recall, : ; c. Neglect perplexed Jury's actual law-questions in-deliberations? 2. Texas prohibits all the Constitutional Rights of innocent citizens, and contradicts SCOTUS & Federal Laws against Sixth and Ninth : Amendments. Whether COA/Texas-courts contravene the U.S. Constitution and Federal laws to :a. Foster but prohibit ; Right of innocent citizens' own-summation, and unreasonably off the record to deprive them, b. Deny innocent citizen's Right-to-Represent themselves, c. Deny innocent citizens' Right-to-Testify under; oath, ; d. Exempt to abet ; white-collar-crimes depriving innocent citizens of their civil rights? (.questions continued to next page) t a ii 3. Texas misinterprets and contravenes the Texas Laws and contradicts SCOTUS & CCA. SCOTUS has yet to answer whether an active-employee can be involuntarily servitude and false-imprisoned at his employment for a fake-trespass without cause or warrant against the Thirteenth Amendment, § 1, and whether COA/Texas-courts with scienter :a. Oppress applicable Texas-laws from Jury despite repeated lucid-objections during charge formulation (What is employees' defense from Trespass-charge at their own work’), b. Breach Texas:laws to unlawfully deny innocent citizen's rightful Directed-Verdict (Does “falling Petitioner's weak body to the ground due to off. duty-police's excessive call Resisting?), 7 c. Promote malicious despite innocent Citizen not even ; committed a civil-offence, d. Unlawfully deny Motion-to-Reopen during e. Filibuster hearings on New-Trial Motions? 4. Texas contravenes the Rules of Evidence against the U.S. & Texas Constitution and contradicts Federal Laws. SCOTUS has yet to answer whether unreasonable search and seizure at employment without any warrant or cause using off-duty ; State's force against the Fourth Amendment applies to States, and whether COA/Texas-courts:a. Exclude critical-evidence after proper: foundation & b. Aid unlawful seizure, admit spoliation legalinsufficient concealed-evidence and_ prohibit disproof against it, c. Propagandize irrelevant contextless hearsays, d. Neglect Expert's demonstration on unlawful use-of-force violating Texas rules regulations? as ) . iii II.