No. 20-1571
Andrew Raymond and Brian Requena v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: analogue-act analogue-enforcement-act controlled-substances criminal-procedure due-process jury-unanimity sixth-amendment vagueness-doctrine
Key Terms:
AdministrativeLaw FirstAmendment DueProcess FifthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
AdministrativeLaw FirstAmendment DueProcess FifthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-06-10
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Controlled Substances Analogue Enforcement Act of 1986 is void for vagueness
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the Controlled Substances Analogue Enforcement Act of 1986 is void for vagueness. 2. Whether the Controlled Substances Analogue Enforcement Act of 1986 requires jury unanimity as to whether a substance is controlled by the Act.
Docket Entries
2021-06-14
Petition DENIED.
2021-05-25
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/10/2021.
2021-05-17
Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
2021-05-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 11, 2021)
Attorneys
Andrew Raymond, et al.
James Evan Felman — Suite 1450, Petitioner
James Evan Felman — Suite 1450, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent