Should the Court overrule Knight and hold that the First Amendment prohibits States from forcing dissident public employees to accept a hostile union as their exclusive bargaining representative?

question presented is: Should the Court overrule Knight and hold that the First Amendment prohibits States from forcing dissident public employees to accept a hostile union as their exclusive bargaining representative? (i) 2. Does 42 U.S.C. § 1983 provide a “good-faith defense” to private entities who violate another’s constitutional rights before the courts have clearly established the illegality of their conduct and, if so, does this “goodfaith defense” allow a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 defendant who takes another person’s money or property in violation of the Constitution—but in reliance on a statute or court ruling that purported to authorize its conduct and is only later declared unconstitutional—to keep that money or property when the owner sues for its return? (ii)