No. 20-1583

Jeffrey Olson v. Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue

Lower Court: Minnesota
Docketed: 2021-05-14
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: administrative-procedure appeal commissioner-order commissioner's-order due-process mail-notice ordinary-mail procedural-due-process tax-appeal tax-assessment tax-procedure
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2021-06-17
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether issuance of a Commissioner's order by ordinary mail meets constitutional requirements of procedural due process

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Under Minnesota tax procedure, the central procedural event is the issuance of a Commissioner’s Order, by which the Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue determines and assesses tax. If the taxpayer fails to file a timely appeal in response to the Commissioner’s Order, the tax assessment in most circumstances becomes final. The Commissioner’s Order in this case was sent by ‘ordinary’ non-certified mail to Petitioner Jeffrey Olson. Olson never received it and therefore did not file a timely appeal. Olson is now legally precluded from ever disputing the merits of the tax assessment. The question presented is whether issuance of the Commissioner’s order by ordinary mail meets constitutional requirements of procedural due process.

Docket Entries

2021-06-21
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2021-05-25
Waiver of right of respondent Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue to respond filed.
2021-05-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 14, 2021)

Attorneys

Jeffrey Olson
Eric William JohnsonJohnson Tax Law P.C., Petitioner
Eric William JohnsonJohnson Tax Law P.C., Petitioner
Minnesota Commissioner of Revenue
John Mitchell O'MahoneyMinnesota Attorney General's Office, Respondent
John Mitchell O'MahoneyMinnesota Attorney General's Office, Respondent