No. 20-161
City of Sacramento, California, et al. v. Robert Mann, Sr., et al.
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2)
Tags: 42-usc-1983 civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process first-amendment intimate-association section-1983 sibling-relationship sibling-relationships standing
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity FirstAmendment DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
SocialSecurity FirstAmendment DueProcess Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-10-16
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the First Amendment protects intimate associations absent expressive activity
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Whether the First Amendment protects intimate associations absent expressive activity; 2. Ifso, whether that protection exceeds what the Due Process Clause provides; 3. Whether sibling relationships can qualify as intimate absent cohabitation; and 4. Whether liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for associational deprivation requires an intent to harm the protected association, rather than also encompassing incidental results.
Docket Entries
2020-10-19
Petition DENIED.
2020-09-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/16/2020.
2020-09-25
Reply of petitioners City of Sacramento, et al. filed. (Distributed)
2020-09-18
Brief of respondents Robert Mann, et al. in opposition filed.
2020-09-08
Response Requested. (Due October 8, 2020)
2020-09-02
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/29/2020.
2020-08-27
Waiver of right of respondent Robert Mann, et al. to respond filed.
2020-08-10
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 14, 2020)
Attorneys
City of Sacramento, et al.
John A. Whitesides — Angelo, Kilday & Kilduff, LLP, Petitioner
John A. Whitesides — Angelo, Kilday & Kilduff, LLP, Petitioner
Robert Mann, et al.
Mark Edwin Merin — Law Office of Mark E. Merin, Respondent
Mark Edwin Merin — Law Office of Mark E. Merin, Respondent