No. 20-1614

John D. Leontaritis v. United States

Lower Court: Fifth Circuit
Docketed: 2021-05-19
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response RequestedResponse WaivedRelisted (2) Experienced Counsel
Tags: circuit-split criminal-law criminal-procedure due-process fact-determination jury-finding jury-instructions reasonable-doubt sentencing sentencing-discretion standard-of-proof
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference: 2021-10-08 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether jury findings impact sentencing

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED This criminal case’s questions concern the impact of jury findings on sentencing. Both recur frequently, especially in cases about drugs. Both are the subject of circuit splits expressly acknowledged by the panel’s majority and dissenting opinions. Both are presented squarely in a clean procedural vehicle. And as to both issues, the panel majority opinion is wrong and the Petitioner is right. 1. Whether, if a jury is instructed to “determine” a fact by indicating a “unanimous finding beyond a reasonable doubt” and does so, the resulting verdict indicates a finding beyond a reasonable doubt, as opposed to a mere failure to find. 2. Whether, if a jury verdict finds a fact beyond a reasonable doubt, a district court’s sentencing decision must accept the jury’s determination or instead may base the sentence on its own independent finding that contradicts the jury’s. ii RELATED CASES United States of America v. John D. Leontaritis, No. 1940498 in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Judgment entered October 9, 2020. United States of America v. John D. Leontaritis, No. in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas. Judgment entered May 17, 2019.

Docket Entries

2021-10-12
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-22
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
2021-09-07
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2021-07-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including September 7, 2021.
2021-07-29
Motion to extend the time to file a response from August 6, 2021 to September 7, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-07-01
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 6, 2021.
2021-06-30
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 7, 2021 to August 6, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-06-07
Response Requested. (Due July 7, 2021)
2021-06-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/17/2021.
2021-05-26
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-05-17
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 18, 2021)

Attorneys

John Leontaritis
Charles Randall FloresBeck Redden LLP, Petitioner
Charles Randall FloresBeck Redden LLP, Petitioner
United States of America
Brian H. FletcherActing Solicitor General, Respondent
Brian H. FletcherActing Solicitor General, Respondent