No. 20-1649

Ronald Jeremy Hyatt v. California

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2021-05-26
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Tags: confrontation-clause due-process effective-assistance-of-counsel fourteenth-amendment preliminary-hearing sixth-amendment witness-disclosure
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the prosecution may refuse to disclose the names and address of the 23 victims and additional witnesses it intends to call at petitioner's preliminary hearing, or does that violate his Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel and to confront the witnesses against him, and his right to due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the prosecution may refuse to disclose the names and address of the 23 victims and additional witnesses it intends to call at petitioner’s preliminary hearing, or does that violate his Sixth Amendment right to the effective assistance of counsel and to confront the witnesses against him, and his right to due process of law under the Fourteenth Amendment?

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-05-20
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 25, 2021)

Attorneys

Ronald Hyatt
Stuart GoldfarbLaw OffIces of Stuart Goldfarb, Petitioner