No. 20-1653
Lazelle Maxwell v. United States
Relisted (2)
Experienced Counsel
Tags: circuit-split criminal-sentencing first-step-act legal-developments procedural-history resentencing sentencing-reduction statutory-interpretation
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Latest Conference:
2022-06-29
(distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether a district court must or may consider intervening legal and factual developments when deciding to impose a reduced sentence under the First Step Act
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether, when deciding if it should “impose a reduced sentence” on an individual under Section 404(b) of the First Step Act of 2018, 21 U.S.C. § 841 note, a district court must or may consider intervening legal and factual developments. (1)
Docket Entries
2022-06-30
Petition DENIED.
2022-06-29
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/29/2022.
2021-09-09
Reply of petitioner Lazelle Maxwell filed. (Distributed)
2021-09-08
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-25
Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
2021-07-20
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including August 25, 2021.
2021-07-19
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 28, 2021 to August 25, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-06-25
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 28, 2021.
2021-06-24
Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 28, 2021 to July 28, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-05-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 28, 2021)
Attorneys
Lazelle Maxwell
Lisa Schiavo Blatt — Williams & Connolly LLP, Petitioner
Lisa Schiavo Blatt — Williams & Connolly LLP, Petitioner
United States of America
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar — Solicitor General, Respondent