No. 20-1655

W. A. Griffin v. Delta Air Lines, Inc., et al.

Lower Court: Eleventh Circuit
Docketed: 2021-05-26
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: anti-alienation anti-assignment claims-fiduciary erisa fiduciary-duty health-benefits plan-administrator waiver
Key Terms:
Arbitration ERISA JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Related Cases: 20-1444 (Vide)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Whether the anti-assignment provision in the Delta Air Lines Plan apply to W. A. Griffin, MD (Dr. Griffin)"

Question Presented (from Petition)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED : Whether the anti-assignment provision in the Delta Air Lines Plan apply to W. A. Griffin, MD (“Dr. ; Griffin”). Anti-assignment and _anti-alienation provisions contained in employer sponsored group health benefit plans subject to the Employee Retirement Investment Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”) are usually not applicable to an assignee ” who is the provider of the services which the plans are maintained to furnish. Dr. Griffin provided health services to Patient G. A., an individual covered by the ; Delta Air Lines, Inc. (“Delta”) employer-sponsored group health benefit plan (“Delta Plan”), and Patient G.A. executed an assignment to Dr. Griffin that states the assignment is a “direct legal assignment of [Patient G.A.’s] rights and benefits under” the Delta _ ; Plan. ; Whether a plan administrator and claims fiduciary cS : can be estopped from asserting, and can waive, an _ anti-assignment or anti-alienation provision by ~~ failing to timely assert the provision. Neither Delta, as plan administrator of the Delta Plan, nor United Q Healthcare Insurance Company (“United”), as claims re fiduciary of the Delta Plan, asserted the application ; of the Delta Plan’s anti-alienation provision during the . process of Dr. Griffin's appeals from underpayment for provided health services. : ii , QUESTIONS PRESENTED Whether Patient G.A. assigned to Dr. Griffin the right ; to sue for breach of fiduciary duties, breach of cofiduciary duties, and failure to provide plan documents. On March 31, 2015, Patient G.A. executed an assignment to Dr. Griffin that states the assignment is a “direct legal assignment of [Patient : G.A.’s] rights and benefits under” the Delta Plan. Whether published Eleventh Circuit case law that voids assignment of benefits using unambiguous antiassignment clauses incorporated into the Delta Plan is legal in Georgia, a state with mandatory provider assignment of benefit legislation. ; ; ili ;

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-06-30
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-25
Waiver of right of respondent Delta Air Lines, Inc., et al. to respond filed.
2021-05-24
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 25, 2021)

Attorneys

Delta Air Lines, Inc., et al.
Tashwanda Pinchback DixonBalch & Bingham LLP, Respondent
Tashwanda Pinchback DixonBalch & Bingham LLP, Respondent
W. A. Griffin
W. A. Griffin — Petitioner
W. A. Griffin — Petitioner