Do I have a constitutional right to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful place in an impartial tribunal to dispute a case in controversy, and do I have procedural due process rights to be given an opportunity to raise an objection to be heard to any cause of action taken against me at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner?

Question Presented William Shecoby Palmer being the disseisor who have a common law claim of right to 390 Lincoln Street in Gary Indiana since 09/26/2017 ,and being equal in the eyes of the law to the tax petitioner Harolyn Williams ask this court do | have a . constitutional right to be heard at meaningful time ,and a meaningful place in a impartial tribunal to dispute a case in controversy ,and do i have Procedural due process rights to be given a opportunity to raise a objection to be heard to any cause of action taken against me at a meaningful time and ina meaningful manner," Perdue _ v. Gargano, 964 N.E.2d 824, 832 (Ind. 2012), and generally includes "'an opportunity to present every available defense," Morton v. Ivacic, 898 N.E.2d 1196, 1199 (Ind, 2008) {quoting Lindsey v. Normet, 405 U.S. 56, 66 (1972) : _ PartiesToThe Proceedings Petitioner William Shecoby Palmer the disseisor for 390 Lincoln Street Gary respondent.is Harolyn Williams tax petitioner in rem ,and constitutional agents for Lake County Peggy Katona & John Petalas action taken in there private capacity 2)