Whether the Court of Appeals Erred in Affirming the Trial Court's Denial of Ms. Rankin's Motion to Suppress Because She was in Law Enforcement's Custody for the Purposes of Miranda and Not Given the Proper Warnings

QUESTIONS PRESENTED FOR REVIEW Whether the Court of Appeals Erred in Affirming the Trial Court’s Denial of Ms. Rankin’s Motion to Suppress Because She was in Law Enforcement’s Custody for the Purposes of Miranda and Not Given the Proper Warnings. Whether the Court of Appeals Erred in Affirming the Trial Court’s Jury Verdict that the Evidence Factually and Legally Did Not Support the Finding that Ms. Rankin Did Not Act Under the Influence of Sudden Passion.