Whether an amicus attorney is allowed to side with someone who damages a child repeatedly, perjures themselves in civil court, and defrauds the opposing party

Questions Presented 1. Is an AMICUS Attorney allowed to side with someone who damages a child repeatedly, perjures themselves in Civil Court numerous times, and defrauds the opposing party biasedly and against TFC 107.009B? 2. Do Federal Victim’s Rights Laws and Standing Orders take precedence over , Temporary Civil Law Orders, in custody battles, where the child is being abused / , | damaged? | 3. If the Petitioner was being defrauded and his child was being actively damaged as in Case DF-17-05507s, is the Amicus then able to declare him “emotionally and , financially unstable”, refuse to set a date for a Full Custody Order, and then state that he “does not have a family”, ex parte, to secure a subjective and libelous Writ to the child’s body or is this Defamation? 4. In the Decree, is the Amicus then able to secure funds from the Petitioner as Title IV Child Support and claim he signed the document? 5. In the Decree is the Amicus able to state that the Petitioner had a “history of neglect” and is “likely to stalk the other party” to ensure payment or jail against Constitutional Provisions without any criminal wrongdoing proven? Mwy Qaavbowig i¢ar rela yidanotP uae each eign d side Lesote'd of Pf ms (oo) gy qutvtenhoviovites Batoe na Lite od tee bedwedioh grid env conotiiet) alm 6 ne pg ade atthe ber reoten Gath 2 abo ease ongerton “aldnide dplen enti 00 re : “CEA onolodif her rrttuvidud o vamos of ashen ae vier) a avid jar aeube od dei. ; a ALL Parties } List of Relevant Cases | , The following constitutes a list of all parties to the trial court's final judgment and the | names and addresses of all trial and appellate counsel: | | Petitioner: Name Mr. Jules Dylan Stuer, Pro Se Father, | ddress 1238 Dalhart Dr., Richardson TX, 75080 Respondent: ame Susan Duesler, Gerald Tadlock, Stephanie eynolds ddress Hidden from Petitioner , | Respondent’s Counsel: ame Ryan McFarlin (who has claimed not to be | espondents counsel but respondent named as het counsel | Il correspondence can be made to the abov | (£an_be made to the above nd below through: Susan Duesler (214) 999-0088 ; 3710 Rawlins St #1420, Dallas, TX 75219 (As the 255" Court’s muse and actor to the maternal child abuse, perjury, solicitation of the child, constructive fraud.) Other parties: Curtis Baggett (Stephanie’s father) (if applicable) endy Carlson (Texas Notary Service and Secretary] ; atricia Hale (Texas Notary Service and Secretary)! racy Woodall (Stephanie’s Mother and CPA), J essicd Blacksheer, Laurie Hoeltzel, Brett “Baggett” Thomas art Baggett, Mr. Reynolds, and all other holders of broperty belonging to the Estate of Lily Ana Stuet Counsel for other Possible parties: ; , Abbreviations, Aliases, and Report Records References Petitioner, Mr. Jules Dylan Stuer, will be referred to as JDS, Plaintiff, or Appellant; Appellee, will be referred to as SD, Defendant, or Appellee. SD’s accomplice in the Defamation was GT, who will be referred to as GT, or Defendant. The Cerks records in any given case will be referred to as: ° CR: [court number, case number} The Reporters record will be referred to as: Clerk’s and Reporter's record will need to be recovered by the Federal Supreme Court Online or on Paper through Supreme Court Service, as Mr. JDS has been Defrauded, is proclaimed “financially indigent” by The Honorable Judge Cooks, of the 255% Court, and is in an inability to pay status due to indenture, debt, and in a victim status. He is also unable to afford 10 copies of the case,