No. 20-1693
Erick Allen Osby v. United States
Amici (4)Response Waived
Tags: constitutional-rights criminal-procedure criminal-sentencing double-jeopardy fifth-amendment jury-acquittal sentencing sixth-amendment
Key Terms:
DueProcess FifthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess FifthAmendment JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether basing a criminal defendant's sentence on charges of which the jury acquitted him violates the Fifth or Sixth Amendments
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether basing a criminal defendant’s sentence on charges of which the jury acquitted him violates the Fifth or Sixth Amendments. @)
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-24
Supplemental brief of petitioner Erick Allen Osby filed.
2021-07-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-07
Brief amici curiae of National Association of Federal Defenders and FAMM filed. (Distributed)
2021-07-07
Brief amici curiae of Former Federal District Court Judges and Law Professors filed. (Distributed)
2021-07-07
Brief amicus curiae of Cato Institute filed. (Distributed)
2021-07-01
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-06-30
Brief amici curiae of Americans for Prosperity Foundation, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Dream Corps Justice, and R Street Institute filed.
2021-06-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 7, 2021)
Attorneys
Americans for Prosperity Foundation, National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers, Dream Corps Justice, and R Street Institute
Cato Institute
Jay Remington Schweikert — The Cato Institute, Amicus
Erick Allen Osby
Caroline Swift Platt — Office of the Federal Public Defender, Petitioner
Former Federal District Court Judges and Law Professors
Christopher D. Man — Winston & Strawn LLP, Amicus
National Association of Federal Defenders and FAMM
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent