No. 20-1713

Symon B. Mandawala v. Era Living, LLC, et al.

Lower Court: Washington
Docketed: 2021-06-10
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Relisted (2)
Tags: 14th-amendment 42-usc-1985 attorney-client-doctrine civil-procedure civil-rights criminal-law due-process equal-protection motion-to-dismiss service-of-process
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess Privacy
Latest Conference: 2021-11-12 (distributed 2 times)
Question Presented (AI Summary)

As of Matter of Equal Protection Clause in the 14th Amendment right of the U.S constitution: (1) (a) while racially civil rights action is pending, without advisory to the court (court order), can a corporate defendant and their representatives (attorneys) demand reservice of the process to the plaintiff with the threat of untimely motion to dismiss without violating 42 U.S.C 1985(2) last clause? (b) Does attorney-client conspiracy or intercorporation doctrine defenses apply to 42 U.S.C 1985(2) last clause pursuing to its criminal elements of 'impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due cause of justice in any state' as federally classified as criminal in 18 U.S.C 1505 and 3512?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

QUESTIONS PRESENTED . The Question(s) Presented is: As of Matter of Equal Protection Clause in the 14th Amendment right of the U.S constitution: . (1) (a) while racially civil rights action is pending, | without advisory to the court (court order), can a { corporate defendant and their representatives (attorneys) demand reservice of the process to the plaintiff with the threat of untimely motion to dismiss ’ without violating 42 U.S.C 1985(2) last clause? (b) Does attorney-client conspiracy or intercorporation doctrine defenses apply to 42 U.S.C 1985(2) last clause pursuing to its criminal elements of “impeding, hindering, obstructing, or defeating, in any manner, the due cause of justice in any state” as federally classified as criminal in 18 U.S.C 1505 and 3512? ‘ : As of matter of Due Process Clause in the 14th Amendment right of the U.S constitution: (2)(a)Does a trial judge have the discretion to deny Plaintiff a one-time Amendment of a complaint or the ’ service of process when the defendant has not to file { responsive pleading (answer)yet? { (b) Where the state court rule designates insufficient service defense to be presented within 20days after the service of process. Does a defendant file notice of appearance to the court toll the 20 days rule to 124 days for the defendant to file a motion to dismiss under that rule? ‘

Docket Entries

2021-11-15
Rehearing DENIED.
2021-10-27
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/12/2021.
2021-10-09
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 12, 2021)

Attorneys

Symon Mandawala
Symon B. Mandawala — Petitioner
Symon B. Mandawala — Petitioner