Can the Governor of Pennsylvania and the Secretary of Transportation be considered 'employees' under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964?

question presented is, can the District Court construe | case law from the (3d Cir.1996) (en banc) to now include , ' elected officials as employees. As the ground to DISMISS the . | : plaintiffs VII and ADEA claims WITH PREJUDICE, | : MOTION TO DISMISS FOR FAILURE TO STATE A : CLAIM, GRANTED. Siting congress intentions, and case : ‘ law, out of context? The District Court ruling is an abuse of discretion. Title VII claims should not be dismissed as a ! matter of law. Also my Appeal has no jurisdiction if the constitutional question asked has never been answered. And dismissed without prejudice. As directed, it’s not a final order. Melvin Walker v. Governor of Pennsylvania, et al. Third Circuit Court of Appeals Docket #: 20-2783 While some claims were dismissed with prejudice, others were dismissed without prejudice, GENERALLY, AN ORDER WHICH DISMISSES A COMPLAINT WITHOUT PREJUDICE IS NEITHER FINAL NOR APPEALABLE. BORELLI V. CITY OF READING, 532 F.2D 950, 951 (3D CIR. 1976) (PER CURIAM). ,