No. 20-1721

James Sawyer v. Rosemary Sawyer, et al.

Lower Court: California
Docketed: 2021-06-11
Status: Denied
Type: Paid
Response Waived
Tags: child-support civil-rights conflict-of-laws due-process full-faith-and-credit modification state-sovereignty uifsa
Key Terms:
DueProcess
Latest Conference: 2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)

Is the right to Due Process as vested in a citizen of the United States durable, transportable, and enforceable in and between the originating and forum state?

Question Presented (OCR Extract)

Questions Presented for Review: 1. UIFSA and Procedural Due Process “Is the right to Due Process as vested in a citizen of the United ; States durable, transportable, and enforceable in and between the originating and forum state? 2. Precedence of conflicting interests. where Due Process is protecting the citizen, and where Full Faith and Credit is protecting the State: ~ Does a sovereign forum state owe to its citizens a duty of due diligence in protecting their rights against infringing actions of a sister state? ; 8. Modification Is an order establishing a duty and obligation different in kind . . from an order calculating a current balance due on said duty, . thus requiring distinct treatment with respect to the meaning : of the word “modification”, prohibited for one, not the other? . 5S

Docket Entries

2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-28
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-09
Waiver of right of respondent Santa Cruz County Department of Child Support Services to respond filed.
2021-06-08
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 12, 2021)

Attorneys

James Sawyer
James A. Sawyer — Petitioner
James A. Sawyer — Petitioner
Santa Cruz County Department of Child Support Services
Jennevee H. de GuzmanCA Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General, Respondent
Jennevee H. de GuzmanCA Department of Justice, Office of the Attorney General, Respondent