Whether the plaintiff should have been awarded default judgment and summary judgment under Ohio civil procedure rules

QUESTION PRESENTED ; In case No. 18 5567 & 2018-0212 Writ and Rehearing in the lower and Supreme Court _ of Ohio: When the City failed to Plead Should Plaintiff Curry been awarded Default Judgement According to law under Ohio Rule of Civil Procedure Rule 4 Process Summons paragraph B and Default Judgement under Ohio Civil Rule 55 Default Judgement.? In Case No. 18 -5568 the City Submitted a bad faith affidavit. Should plaintiff Curry had been Awarded Summary Judgement by the Clerk under Ohio Rules of Civil Procedure Rule 56 (g) Affidavits made in Bad Faith.? In Case No 1:19 CV 2984 when the court denied plaintiff Curry’s Informa Pauperis Status and she became aware of the denial and paid the fee. Should the United States District Court for the Norther District of Ohio have served her complaint on the defendants to try to get the decision overturned due to a government employee not performing their job (mandamus) and awarding Plaintiff curry Default Judgement in Case No. 18-5557 and Summary Judgement in Case No. 18-5568 for the City submitting a Bad Faith Affidavit and Preponderance of Evidence.? ' Oo ee pg 4 . t . ; x *, 2