No. 20-1768
Ron Fenn v. City of Truth or Consequences, New Mexico, et al.
Tags: civil-rights constitutional-rights due-process free-speech government-accountability government-actor qualified-immunity standing supreme-court-precedent
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity FirstAmendment FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
SocialSecurity FirstAmendment FourthAmendment CriminalProcedure Privacy
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the lower courts err in dismissing Petitioners' case on the basis of Qualified-Immunity
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
question presented is: Did the lower courts err in dismissing Petitioners’ case on the basis of Qualified Immunity in the face of US Supreme Court precedent and New Mexico jurisprudence clearly establishing the right that was violated?
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-09-01
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-08-13
Brief of respondents City of Truth or Consequences, Lee Alirez, Daniel Hicks in opposition filed.
2021-08-13
Brief of respondent Daniel Hicks in opposition filed.
2021-07-15
Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including August 13, 2021, for all respondents.
2021-07-14
Motion to extend the time to file a response from July 21, 2021 to August 13, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
2021-06-16
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 21, 2021)
Attorneys
City of Truth or Consequences, Lee Alirez, Daniel Hicks
Mark Daniel Standridge — Jarmie & Rogers, P.C., Respondent
Daniel Hicks
Stephen Samuel Hamilton — Montgomery & Andrews, P.A., Respondent
Ron Fenn