No. 20-1799
Hozie Rowell v. Joan Ferreira, et al.
Response Waived
Tags: batson-challenge civil-rights due-process equal-protection juror-bias jury-selection peremptory-challenges peremptory-strike racial-discrimination
Key Terms:
SocialSecurity DueProcess
SocialSecurity DueProcess
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Did the court of appeals contravene Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986)
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION(S) PRESENTED Did the court of appeals contravene Batson v. Kentucky, 476 U.S. 79 (1986) when in affirming the peremptory striking of the only qualified AfricanAmerican on the jury panel it wrongly focused on whether defense counsel had credibly described the juror’s physical movements instead of whether the juror’s physical movements had truly motivated defense counsel to strike this juror?
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-12
Waiver of right of respondent Joan Ferreira, et al. to respond filed.
2021-06-11
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 26, 2021)
Attorneys
Joan Ferreira, et al.
Jonathan A Popolow — New York City Law Department, Respondent
Jonathan A Popolow — New York City Law Department, Respondent