No. 20-1808
Adam E. Billings v. United States
Response Waived
Tags: circuit-split criminal-procedure due-process eighth-circuit kisor-v-wilkie sentencing-guidelines supreme-court-precedent united-states-v-booker united-states-v-roach
Key Terms:
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
DueProcess JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Sentencing Guidelines §2D1.1 Application Note 4 violates procedural due process
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED oe 1. Whether the Sentencing Guidelines §2D1.1 Application Note 4 violates procedural due process. , 2. Whether the Eighth Circuit’s decision in United States v. Roach conflict with this Court’s holdings in United States v. Booker and Kisor v. Wilkie. . i ;
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-07-14
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-07-12
Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
2021-05-01
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 28, 2021)
Attorneys
Adam E. Billings
Adam E. Billings — Petitioner
United States
Brian H. Fletcher — Acting Solicitor General, Respondent