Whether the Seventh Circuit panel majority's decision conflicts with the Thirteenth and Fifth Amendments

QUESTION(S) PRESENTED , 1. Whether the Seventh Circuit panel majority’s decision, rendered on February 28, eee 2020, affirming the judgment of the District Court conflicts with the Thirteenth and Fifth Amendments of the United States Constitution and U.S. Supreme Court’s decisions. . 2. Whether the first section of the Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, by its own unaided force and effect, nullified District Court Judge Charles R. Norgle’s arbitrary dismissal of the case, and his arbitrary denial of class certification and dismissal of class action complaint, for having the effect of upholding Respondent’s ongoing discriminatory hiring and promotion policies (or customs having the force of law) inflicting involuntary servitude on members of the Black male class, including Petitioner as a member. 3. Whether Respondent’s ongoing discriminatory hiring and promotion policies (or customs having the force of law) inflicting involuntary servitude on members of the Black male class, including Petitioner as a member, have deprived and continue to deprive said class members of their Thirteenth Amendment right to be free from involuntary servitude without due process of law under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. 4, Whether the requirements of Rule 23(a) and (b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are satisfied as alleged in Count 1 of Petitioner's amended complaint filed October 1, 2018, in the District Court. 1