Is it constitutional to leave a person in the custody of someone they alleged torture against?

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Isit constitutional to leave a person in the custody of someone they alleged torture against? 2. Is it constitutional to use a grievance policy to obstructed justice? 3. Is it constitutional to expect perfect compliance with the rules for a pro se habeas corpus application who is being tortured and obstructed? 4. Is it constitutional to use the rules of the Court to justify torture? 5. Ifno exceptional circumstances be used to justify torture, can the rules ofthe court be used to justify torture? 6. Is it constitutional to use the rules of the Court to obstruct justice? 7. Is it constitutional to detain a person under any law that is not criminal law? 8. Is it constitutional for a person or persons to be deprived of life, liberty, or property by IMMIGRATION COURT when the same is not part of the UNITED STATES judicial branch responsible for the due process of law? 9. Given the common law nature of the Privilege of Writ of Habeas Corpus, does a corrupt court constitute a suspension of the Privilege of Writ of Habeas Corpus for person or persons held within its jurisdiction? 10. Is suspending the Privilege of Writ of Habeas Corpus for any reason and by any means not permitted by the United States Constitution an act of treason : or the invariable pursuit of the Object? i SUSPENSION OF FREEDOM | The UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT IN THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO (the “US . DISTRICT COURT”) received evidence of federal treason and the invariable pursuit of the OBJECT from the Petitioner with the petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus submitted on June 2 of 2021 and, to the knowledge of the Petitioner, has not taken appropriate measures given the imperative public importance of such evidence, but has suspended the application for Writ of Habeas Corpus in violation of the United States Constitution, 28 U.S.C. § 2243, 18 U.S.C. §3771, and the United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (the “United Nations Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment”) which requires a court to “award the writ”. The aforementioned evidence detailed the mismanagement of the Covid emergency, as articulated by JESUIT affiliated CARLO MARIA VIGANO, Titular Archbishop of Ulpiana, when he said that the mismanagement of the Covid emergency was being used to build a world without freedom through the dissolution of social order: Solve et Coagula as the MASONIC adage teaches. Ignoring the imperative public importance of such evidence and the United States Constitution which forbids the suspension of the Privilege of Writ of Habeas Corpus, MAGISTRATE JUDGE GORDEN P. GALLAGHER of the US District CourT, on May 26 of 2021, ordered the application deficient on the basis of no case number being provided on the application; the Petitioner has received no further orders from the US DISTRICT ii Court as of June 20 of 2021. The US District CourRT has continued a “long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism” in the suspension of the Privilege of Writ of Habeas Corpus. HABEAS CORPUS GUARANTEES FREEDOM The Privilege of Writ of Habeas Corpus is guaranteed by the United States , Constitution for the prevention or speedy relief of a person or persons seized or imprisoned without due process of law, which stands as the greatest bulwark against the invariable pursuit of the OBJECT; for when habeas corpus is executed and respected, it is impossible for Despotism to occur. In fact, the Declaration of Independence necessitates the existence of habeas corpus, as it stands in as the greatest defence mechanism for the preservation of liberty that dates back to the . the Magna Carta. The persecution of the ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH during the PROTESTANT REFORMATION necessitated the development of a country that would ; explicitly execute and respect habeas corpus, the UNITED STATES OF AM