Whether the High Court has jurisdiction (Authority) to conduct judicial review

Question Presented e Whether the High Court has jurisdiction (Authority) to conduct judicial review from the Circuit court’s Order refusing to accept petitioner’s related pleadings and exhibits associated with orders, recalling the mandates of serious tainted decisions and related decisions,involving fraud on the court and judicial conflicts of interest. e Whether Circuit Judges had serious conflicts of interest associated with fraud on the court affords petitioner a second bite at the apple pertaining to his litigations (Recalling Mandates in case and ) related cases). See US v. Beggerly, 1998. e Whether a District Court judge should have recused himself as a General Partner with White & Case law : : firm and Partners and former Partners and Spouses including the court’s spouse in LLC Wallpark LLC, in related case. e Whether District Court Judge had jurisdiction to . hear second related case in 94cv2436 Whitehead v. Paramount Pictures, et al. 2 e Whether District Court Judge had serious conflicts in the case before the court: Whitehead v. Paramount Pictures, et al,96cv1616 associated with Circuit Case Whitehead v. Paramount Pictures, et al, 96-7212. e Whether both District Court Judge had prior knowledge of the petitioner relating to suing Delegate Norton and Circuit Judge having ex parte communication with petitioner prior to ruling against him. e Whether the second District court’s spouse’s employment with Nixon & Peabody LLP having interest in the petitioner cases before the General Partner Judge of White & Case LLP and Wallpark LLC, required the Judge to recuse himself. e Whether the Circuit Judges should have recused . ; themselves having serious and fraudulent conflicts of interest in petitioner’s cases associated with the Judge. e Whether the Judge’s law firm White & Case LLP and the Circuit Judge’s ruling adversely against petitioner in the case represented Governor George W. Bush in Bush v. Gore, 2000, requiring disqualification. 3 e Whether the Chief DC Circuit Judge (2009 judicial panel) violated conflicts of interest laws and statutes presiding on petitioner’s cases as President of Harvard University’s Board of Overseers with defendant’s witnesses and employees. e Whether District Court Judge (A General Partner with the law firm and partners, former partners and spouses in Wallpark LLC) should have recused himself in second related case, or Circuit Court judges should have disqualified themselves from petitioner’s cases due to serious conflicts. e Whether the Circuit Court Judges (2009 Judicial © panel)should have recuse the judge, who had serious conflicts of interest associated with Fraud on the court. e Whether Circuit Judge Douglas Ginsburg should have recused himself in the petitioner’s cases ‘ : (Whitehead v. Paramount Pictures, et al,96-7212 — panel, and Whitehead v. Paramount Pictures, et al, : 08-8010, Whitehead v. CBS Viacom, et al.,08-8015 and Whitehead v. FEC, FCC, et al.,08-8016 panel) having ex parte communication with the petitioner at the District of Columbia Motor Vehicles in Southwest DC, while driving his White Convertible Cadillac. 4 e Did the Circuit court Judge Douglas Ginsburg (967212 panel and related panel Whitehead v. Paramount Pictures, et al., 08-8010, Whitehead v. CBS Viacom, et al., 08-8015 and Whitehead v. FEC, FCC, et al., 08-8016) violate prior Knowledge statutes having ex parte meeting and contact with the petitioner regarding the court's withdrawal of Supreme Court . nomination, due to prior drug use. e Did Chief Judge (Merritt Garland (2009 panel) of District of Columbia Circuit court violate petitioner’s constitutional rights (5% and 14*) Amendments having prior knowledge of petitioner stemming from his lawsuits before Judge Paul L. Friedman and others. e Whether opposing counsels in related cases had prior knowledge of White & Case LLP and Wallpark LLC Investors Enterprise associated with Judge Friedman and others violating the statutes and laws. e Whether the Circuit court