No. 20-1825
Tags: brady-disclosure brady-v-maryland criminal-procedure due-process exculpatory-evidence guilty-plea plea-bargaining prosecutorial-misconduct united-states-v-ruiz
Key Terms:
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
DueProcess HabeasCorpus
Latest Conference:
2021-09-27
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether due process entitles a defendant to exculpatory information pre-plea
Question Presented (from Petition)
QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. RELEVANT ISSUES: Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963), enshrined the principle that the prosecution is obligated to provide a criminal defendant all material exculpatory evidence as a matter of due process. United States v. Ruiz, 536 U.S. 622 (2002), qualified that proposition, enunciating the rule that prosecutors are not required to furnish impeachment material to an accused entering a guilty plea. QUESTION 1: The central question in this case is whether due process entitles a defendant to exculpatory information pre-plea.
Docket Entries
2021-10-04
Petition DENIED.
2021-08-18
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
2021-06-25
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 2, 2021)
Attorneys
Jeffrey McClatchy
Alexey Valerievich Tarasov — Law Office of Alexey Tarasov, Petitioner
Alexey Valerievich Tarasov — Law Office of Alexey Tarasov, Petitioner