Whether the Bankruptcy Court erred in failing to recognize that Section 523(a)(6) prohibits the Debtor from discharging willful-and-malicious copyright-and-trademark-infringement claims

QUESTIONS PRESENTED 1. Question: Whether the Bankruptcy Court erred when the Bankruptcy Court failed to recognize that Section 523(a)(6) of the Bankruptcy Code prohibits the Debtor from discharging "willful and malicious" copyright and trademark infringement claims that are contingent? . 2. The Debtor misrepresented and omitted over twenty-two (22) items in his Bankruptcy Petition and Schedule. Question: Whether the Bankruptcy Court's decision not to dismiss the Debtor's Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Case for bad faith violates Jn re Green v: Staples (In re Green), 934 F.2d 568 (4th Cir.1991)? 3. When it comes to a Debtor making false statements in his/her Bankruptcy Application, does Inre Green v. Staples (In re Green), 934 F.2d 568 (4th Cir. 1991) distinguish between the size of the false statement? In other words, does Jn re Green v. Staples (In re Green), 934 F.2d 568 (4th Cir.1991) make a distinction between material false statements and immaterial false statements by the Debtor. 4. Whether the Bankruptcy Court's analysis that Debtor Eric J. Blair does not have an ongoing and independent duty to provide accurate and complete information on his schedules regardless of whether he was assisted by counsel in preparing his schedules violates In re Barrows, 399 B.R. 506, 511 (Bankr. D. Minn. 2009) and violates Jn re Rolland, 317_B.R. 402, 414 and violates Jn re Petiey,288 BR. 14, 20 5. Rule 9024 states that Rule 60 F. R. Civ P. applies in cases under the Bankruptcy Code. Rule 60(b)(1), F. R. Civ. P., states that the Court may relieve a party from a final judgment or order for mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect, and section (b)(6) allows for any other reason that justifies relief. Question: Are the Creditors entitled to relief under the excusable neglect theory. 1