Franklin Cox v. Texas Workforce Commission, et al.
Environmental SocialSecurity Securities Immigration
Whether the employee has a duty to defend the employer in a tax audit for unemployment, joined as an employer in the above referenced cause
No question identified. : ; 1. Will the employee have.a.duty. to defend . employer tax audit for unemployment joined ; ; as employer in the above reference cause? . ; 2. Under Tex. Lab. Code 207.044 Misconduct ° ° neglect that jeopardizes-the life or property of . another does the legal standard. vicarious liaes bilityan employer. canbe held liable -for its employee degree. of careless as -to evidence . a disregard. of.-the consequence, an whether manifested through action or inaction apply in the above reference cause? oo : 3. How can the substantial evidence rule be properly applied when no date in the record . that. misconduct occurred on to satisfy the first prongs of misconduct and second prongs discharge close in time to termination? 4.Did supervisor cause employee to. abandoned job assignment, refusal of job “assignment, or delay performance of job assignment? . 5. Within the scope of employer's business or related. to employer's equipment what confide° ntial and proprietary information ‘was disclosed to.employee including trainingonatask _ -task basis for assignment? . 6. 1s Affirmative Defense of Impracticability ; or Impossibility of Performance with summary evidence sufficient toraise an‘issue of: fact ‘ oneach element to preclude summary judgment. is applicable to above reference cause? : See Brownlee v. Brownlee, 665.8. W. 2d-111, oF 112 (Tex. 1984). Se . -l