No. 20-195
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe v. Tulalip Tribes, et al.
Response Waived
Experienced Counsel
Tags: d-c-circuit indian-tribes judicial-decree judicial-precedent ninth-circuit precedent treaty-fishing-rights treaty-interpretation treaty-rights
Key Terms:
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Privacy JusticiabilityDoctri
Latest Conference:
2020-10-30
Question Presented (AI Summary)
Whether the Ninth Circuit impermissibly narrowed a decades-old judicial decree to deprive Indian tribes of treaty fishing rights
Question Presented (OCR Extract)
QUESTION PRESENTED Whether the Ninth Circuit, in conflict with precedent of this Court and the D.C. Circuit, impermissibly narrowed a decades-old judicial decree so as to deprive Indian tribes of their ability to exercise treaty fishing rights. @)
Docket Entries
2020-11-02
Petition DENIED. Justice Barrett took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.
2020-10-07
DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/30/2020.
2020-10-07
Reply of petitioner Muckleshoot Indian Tribe filed. (Distributed)
2020-09-18
Waiver of right of respondent Nisqually Indian Tribe to respond filed.
2020-09-18
Brief of respondents Tulalip Tribes, et al. in opposition filed.
2020-08-14
Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 21, 2020)
Attorneys
Muckleshoot Indian Tribe
Pratik Arvind Shah — Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP, Petitioner
Pratik Arvind Shah — Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld, LLP, Petitioner
Nisqually Indian Tribe
Jay J. Manning — Cascadia Law Group, Respondent
Jay J. Manning — Cascadia Law Group, Respondent
Tulalip Tribes, et al.
James Miller Jannetta — Swinomish Indian Tribal Community, Respondent
James Miller Jannetta — Swinomish Indian Tribal Community, Respondent